Search for: "Roper v. No Named Defendants"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (1980) and United States Parole Comm’n v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (1980) and United States Parole Comm’n v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 3:17 am
Roper. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
In McMahon v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:39 am
" Wade v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm
Roper and United States Parole Comm'n v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
Nat'l Bank of Jackson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:19 pm
Bank v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:10 am
Defendant was driving a rented vehicle and was not named on the rental agreement or any other documents, either as the renter or as an authorized driver. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
The ABA Journal has a new article on sentences of life without parole for juvenile defendants, an issue raised by two cases - Graham v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:24 am
Lucero v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Roper, 445 U.S. 326, 339 (1980). [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:15 am
"The court's parting attempt to downplay the significance of its extensive discussion of foreign law is unconvincing. 'Acknowledgment' of foreign approval has no place in the legal opinion of this court unless it is part of the basis for the court's judgment, which is surely what it parades as today," Scalia said.More on Roper v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
The Age of the Child: Interrogating Juveniles After Roper v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:06 am
Roper (N.Y. 1838) 21 Wend. 615, 34 Am.Dec. 273)) to a plaintiff child so as to bar the child's recovery against an admittedly negligent defendant; defendants seek to obtain a like dispensation through the jury's application (in reality, misapplication) to the nebulous superseding cause doctrine. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:06 am
” In Roper, by contrast, the district court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount tendered by the defendant, even though the plaintiffs had refused that offer. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:06 am
” In Roper, by contrast, the district court entered judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount tendered by the defendant, even though the plaintiffs had refused that offer. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
The biggest problem for the defendant was a 1980 decision (Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:30 pm
Roper (1980) 445 U.S. 326, 332. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Florida and its reasoning in a significant but not yet sufficiently appreciated 2007 decision in Panetti v. [read post]
